2014 Simi Valley Election Results

Bob Huber was re-elected as Mayor of Simi Valley. Congratulations to Bob Huber for earning another term as Mayor.

In 2012, the people spoke and told Barbra Williamson they were ready for her to move on. They have spoken again and confirmed their decision was final. Both Mike Judge and Glen Becerra were re-elected to the City Council. The people of Simi Valley sent a message yesterday that it takes more than a smear campaign to change their minds about who represents them on the council. Congratulations to Mike Judge and Glen Becerra.

For Simi Valley School Board, Bill Daniels is the top vote getter and has earned a spot on the Board. Scott Blough appears to be the second most vote getter, earning 18.79% of the vote. Right behind him is Elaine Litster, with 18% of the votes and a discrepancy of just under 300 votes behind Blough. She outperformed the incumbent candidate and a three time experienced candidate, gaining momentum for her campaign late in the race, and without a boost from any of the active unions. If these are the final figures and Daniels and Blough are for sure our new trustees, Litster MUST run again. She will surely be victorious if she tries again in two years.

Congratulations to everyone!  And brace yourselves… the next election is in two years and it’s unlikely that it will be as quiet as this one.

The Barbra Williamson Mistake

Debbie Thomas, Paula Cornell and Judy Pepiot have chosen to rescind their endorsement of Barbra Williamson. They are planning to mail a letter to Simi Valley women who previously received their first letter of endorsement. What follows is the text of that letter…

We made a mistake.

We love Simi Valley and in our effort to support qualified women to the city council we asked you to support Barbra Williamson as someone who would bring people together and work collaboratively.

We were wrong and we need your help to fix it.

We’re rescinding our endorsement of Barbra Williamson as a result of a vicious smear campaign she is running that smacks of Washington and Sacramento politics that has no place in Simi Valley.

We know that disagreements are part of politics. We know that different opinions are healthy parts of campaigns. We also know that personal attacks and destruction are ruining our ability to work as a community and we all need to stand up against it when we see it.

Standing up against this type of politics is what we’re doing now and we strongly encourage you to join us. The only way this behavior will stop is if we all take a stand.

We made a mistake. We were wrong. We’re embarrassed to have been fooled. Please help us make it right by rejecting the campaign attacks of Barbra Williamson.

There’s no place for personal attacks in Simi Valley.”

– Debbie Thomas, Paula Cornell and Judy Pepiot

Women Displeased With Barbra Williamson

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Women of Simi Valley Disgusted with Barbra Williamson’s Vicious Tactics

Simi Valley, CA (Oct. 30, 2014): Last month, Paula Cornell, Judy Pepiot and Debbie Thomas sent a letter to the women of Simi Valley urging them to vote for Barbra Williamson for the Simi Valley City Council. Today, in light of the disgusting and vicious hit piece Williamson mailed about City Councilman Glen Becerra, the three denounced Williamson’s tactics and urged voters to vote against her.

“Barbra Williamson surprised us all with a hit piece on Glen Becerra today that is reprehensible,” Cornell, Pepiot and Thomas said in a follow-up letter to the women of Simi Valley. “It is politics at its worse. It was meant to do harm to a city councilman who is highly respected in our city. Simi Valley deserves better and it deserves a City Council who can and will work together to continue doing what is best for our community.”

Cornell, Pepiot and Thomas are all involved in numerous volunteer roles that sustain and bolster the quality of life in Simi Valley. Each tackle their volunteer jobs by working with all sectors of government, as well as nonprofit groups, service clubs and the public. Over the years, they have had close encounters with almost everyone involved in Simi Valley’s decision-making processes. They endorsed Williamson because they believed the city needed a woman’s perspective on the City Council.

“We signed the original letter on the understanding that Barbra would run a clean campaign. Now we fear this may not be the last hit piece from her. Shame on Barbra for stooping as low as she did to say nasty untruths about a city councilman” Thomas said.

###

Williamson Supporter Slams POA

I read a lot of positive letters to the Editor of the Simi Valley Acorn this morning, along with a few negative ones.  Among the negatives was a letter from a Barbra Williamson supporter with some commentary regarding the Simi Valley POA’s lack of support for her campaign.

So now let me get this straight. Barbra worked to get $100 million for Simi Valley, which included this shooting range for our police department, and yet the Simi Valley Police Officers Association isn’t endorsing her? What’s up with that? Maybe they like all that extra overtime and the comfy desk jobs.

To read the letter in its entire context, click here.

The Simi Valley POA has been very active this election cycle. They’ve endorsed Simi Valley School board candidates (Blough and Daniels) in addition to their endorsements for Council and Mayor. They’ve also made financial contributions to several Council candidates beyond the ones they endorsed.  Their motives appear to be in the best interest of the community, encouraging democracy and providing voters with more choices than just the incumbents. I applaud their efforts.

Lawsuit fizzles

There’s not a whole lot about the complicated legal process regarding the robocall suit that I feel I have a firm grasp on. I will say that I was hoping the identities of the robocallers would be confirmed on the record. Those close to the story already know the culprits. During this process, their emotions have ranged from angry defiance to fear to outward joy, and during the fear phases, they discussed it and ratted each other out through the email forms, anonymous tweets and other formats. A brave lot… In short, most know who they are but a few were hoping (for once) they might actually get their names attached to their anonymous messages. No such luck this time.  They love their city and they love their political positions… anonymously.

When the court determines that a message is protected by the first amendment, then there’s no further interest in pursuing the identities of the anonymous culprits. That’s the only message to take away.

I plan to do myself a favor and ignore the City Council campaigns this year (except for Barbra Williamson’s, which will play out like reality TV) and maybe some year we can restore civility to this process. Maybe someday it won’t be such a heinous fight. Until then, I’ll continue to receive my bi-annual threat of lawsuit from people who wine about vexatious litigation and launch attack campaigns with fake Facebook accounts.

Tom Foolery or Public Service? You Decide

DUI

Hello Simi Valley!

It looks like the current election season began on July 14, 2014, at least for the Simi Valley City Council race, and already the muck is flying about! And who would expect anything less than dirt and skulduggery from our fine citizenry? And to think, those who love to heap the dirt the farthest and highest somehow think they can keep credit for their mischievous glee hidden from the rest of us. As if being a scum raking bottom feeder might interfere with their claims to “pillar of community” standing?

Now, we here at Vote Simi Valley understand that during a hard fought campaign the stuff can hit the fan and the fan can cause some unintended splatter, but if you’re going to throw the muck at the fan to begin with, you should get credit for your wonderful deeds. No need to hide under rocks! Come out from the shadows!

An example of the first round of muckery is the anonymously sourced posting of the Sojka dui video on the afternoon of July 15, 2014 by Hews Media Group, begging the question, just where did they get the video? Hews Media Group’s principle, Brian Hews, has stated, “We will not reveal our sources.”

Fair enough.

The El Segundo City Clerk’s Office, on the other hand, has no problem informing who requested the video and when they sent out the video. In fact, as a governmental agency, they are required by law to disclose who requested the video.

It turns out that on March 26, 2014, the City of El Segundo received its very first request for all information regarding the Sojka arrest from none other than Simi Valley resident Tom Mackel.

Fight On Tom!

Mr. Mackel presented a second request to the City of El Segundo for information on Sojka on June 18, 2014, again on July 2, 2014 and again on July 9, 2014. It would appear that Mr. Mackel hit the jackpot when the City of El Segundo released to him a copy of the dui video on July 15, 2014. And of course, that would be the same date that the dui video was splashed far and wide throughout the electronic frontier.

Now, it may only be a coincidence that Mr. Mackel had the only copy of the dui video legitimately released by the City of El Segundo as of July 15. And it may only be a coincidence that the dui video hit the street running on July 15. That is not to say that Tom Mackel is responsible for releasing the video to media and others for posting on Face Book. No, why Mr. Mackel’s computer could have been hacked or his wifi could have been tapped. In fact, Mr. Mackel may merely have been obsessively intent on obtaining copies of the Sojka material just to fill out his own personal archive of responses to public record act requests.

Nonetheless, Tom Mackel clearly deserves the credit for doggedly digging for that video and being the first to be rewarded with its receipt from the City of El Segundo on July 15, 2014.

Hurray Tom! You were the first!

And I’m sure its only a coincidence that the very same video was splashed far and wide later that day with the source kept anonymous.

[Editor’s Disclosure:  Mitch represents a lot of people through his law practice in Simi Valley, to include Steve Sojka and Glen Becerra on matters not related to the dui video]

The Arrest Video

A video is circulating right now that shows Councilmember Steve Sojka being arrested on a DUI charge a few months ago. The video was acquired by Hews Media Group, submitted by an anonymous source. Since the arrest, Sojka has plead no contest in Los Angeles court and was subsequently sentenced to three years probation and required to participate in an alcohol abuse program.

Things like this shake people up and can polarize a community. Even sharing this video has the potential to spark an ugly debate and get people fighting. I sincerely hate that. But pretending it didn’t happen is foolish. These things matter to our community.

During Steve Sojka’s 2008 campaign for City Council, I didn’t feel like he and I were on the same page. He reached out to me on a personal level in 2010 during his campaign for Mayor and we spent a good deal of time talking to each other and getting to understand each others’ positions, and getting to know each other in general, something that meant a great deal to me. I hope that he is able to take this situation and turn it into something positive by teaching the youth in our community that even the most caring and cautious individuals can make mistakes that have dire consequences and that the risks aren’t worth it.

Robocall Story Moves Forward

The robocall story continues to progress, believe it or not. Of course, I’m not allowed to talk about what I know. There’s no legal obligation preventing me from talking about these discoveries, but in order to get updates I’ve been asked to keep these findings confidential which drives me a little crazy. These are important facts that people need to know. People will learn them in time, but my patience is wearing thin.

As milestones have been reached and new information has come to light, I’ve found the whole situation to be more and more troubling. Those behind the robocall are firm in their belief that what they did was right. They are certain that what they did was for the benefit of Simi Valley. Yet they continue very desperately to hide their identities and steadfastly refuse to admit the robocall script contained misleading statements and falsehoods. The time between the date of the robocall to now, with all of the discoveries, has completely shaken my belief system. THESE are the people behind it?? Despite disagreements, I always assumed these were people who were just exceedingly passionate. But they’re really just sneaky liars.

This fight will carry on beyond the June court date for the robocall lawsuit. People will celebrate the upcoming news, but I won’t. I’m sad. This will distract from the elections and shake things up even more. Every election, I think I’m going to rekindle my own passion and cover this stuff more in depth, but I know now that I won’t. Instead, I’ll be immersed in stories about sneaky liars who despite their best efforts and lots of money to stay hidden, are now genuinely fucked, and I’ll hope things settle and get better for our community in the next two years.

Simi Valley still deserves better.

Unauthorized Grade Changes at Grace Brethren High School

The following article was published by the Ventura County Star on September 11, 2013:

Sept. 11–A private Christian school in Simi Valley is standing by its principal after admitting he wrongfully changed a student’s grade in a class.

Leaders of Grace Brethren High School and its affiliated church say John Hynes will remain as principal despite the grade change because he admitted it and asked for forgiveness.

“It was a one-time event. It’ll never happen again,” Hynes said Wednesday. “I made a human mistake. Thank God the school didn’t fire me like another organization would have.” Hynes said the grade change was not intentional. A former Spanish teacher at the school, however, claims Hynes also changed test grades of four students in her class, including his own daughter. All four were members of the swim team.

Pastor Jordan Bakker of Grace Brethren Church said leaders investigated the Spanish teacher’s allegations and found a problem only with the grade of an unidentified student in a different class. That grade has been changed back, and the school has taken measures to make sure something like this does not happen again, Bakker said.

“There was an academic breach of integrity with our principal. There was a changing of a grade for one student in one class,” Bakker said. “He admitted it and owned up to that, which brought about swift and substantial disciplinary action.” Bakker would not disclose how Hynes was disciplined but said the action is “still ongoing.” The misconduct took place before summer break, in the last academic year. Hynes has worked since 2005 at Grace Brethren, where annual high school tuition for one student is $9,300, according to its website.

Ray Blackwell, executive director of the school, sent emails to parents Tuesday night informing them about the incident. Hynes sent a similar email to parents Wednesday.

Honesty and integrity?

Anke Saldarriaga, a Spanish teacher at Grace Brethren last year, said Hynes deleted and altered test scores in her class without informing her. The changes led to Hynes’s daughter receiving a B instead of a C in the class and another student receiving a C instead of a D, said Saldarriaga.

“Schools stand for honesty and integrity, and this is not it,” said Saldarriaga, who has since resigned from the school. The resignation was unrelated to the grade change incident, she said.

Saldarriaga said that earlier in the school year, Hynes expressed concerns to her about his daughter being on track to get only a C in Spanish.

Hynes, however, gave a different version of what happened. The principal said he deleted the test scores of his daughter and three other students because they were not in class when the date of the test was announced.

Bakker and Saldarriaga said the four were at an athletic event the day the test date was announced.

Hynes also said the test violated school policy because Saldarriaga assigned too much weight to it.

Saldarriaga said that when she found out, she confronted Hynes to argue it was unfair to delete the test grades of only four students.

Hynes said he agreed and deleted the test scores of the entire class.

School leaders said they investigated Saldarriaga’s accusations and concluded Hynes did not do anything wrong in her class.

Bakker said principals almost always support teachers, but on rare occasions, such as this one, they disagree.

“Administrators and teachers are free to discuss policies and grades and they’re not always going to see eye to eye,” Bakker said.

Other teachers contacted by The Star failed to return calls or declined to comment, referring all questions to administrators.

Different in public schools

According to school records, Hynes deleted test grades of four students, including his own daughter, on June 9-10 in Saldarriaga’s class. The records also show he made modifications June 9-10 to his daughter’s history grades.

Hynes said the school records do not show anything unusual. He said teachers and administrators routinely make modifications to the grade book to see how a final grade would be affected if a student received a different grade on a particular test.

Asked if he had altered his daughter’s grades, Hynes said he could not comment because she is a minor.

Saldarriaga said the school’s explanation of what happened is a “half-truth.” “That would mean there’s a half-lie. Where is the honesty? If you want to be honest, be completely honest,” she said. “They’re teaching something that’s contrary to the Bible and it’s a shame.” Private schools like Grace Brethren have their own regulations when it comes to the authority of administrators. Public schools must abide by the state education code, which prohibits administrators from changing a grade given by a teacher.

Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Stan Mantooth said that in public schools, there are exceptions in the event of a clerical mistake, fraud or incompetency.

“Other than that, the governing board, superintendent, principals do not change grades,” Mantooth said.

If a principal at a public school insists on changing a grade, the matter must be reviewed by the school district and the teacher must have an opportunity to defend the grade.

“It’s part of checks and balances,” Mantooth said. “You don’t want things changed at the higher level because of political pressure.” sin and redemption As a Christian organization, Grace Brethren believes in redemption and feels Hynes truly repented for changing the grade of one student, said Pastor Bakker.

“We hold integrity in a very high regard. Every leader needs to maintain their integrity, and yet we are all fallible people. We’re all sinful people,” Bakker said. “We also believe there’s a process of redemption. We try to be consistent that way with students. If they mess up one time, it’s not, ‘You’re outta here.’ ” Bakker said the school’s information technology department has taken steps since the incident to ensure that grades given by a teacher cannot be altered by one person.

“We believe he can continue to lead the campus academically and spiritually,” Bakker said of Hynes. “We will stand with him 100 percent.” Hynes said he is more proud of Grace Brethren after seeing the school’s ability to forgive.

“We’re better now than we were before,” Hynes said. “We’ve grown and learned from this.” ___ (c)2013 Ventura County Star (Camarillo, Calif.) Visit Ventura County Star (Camarillo, Calif.) at http://www.vcstar.com

Dear Mitch, May 12, 2013

556920_497264096977712_385366256_n
Dear Readers,

Its been a busy week and my inbox is going nuts. While there is still interest on what is happening at the Simi Valley City Hall regarding the City Attorney’s continued troubles, what with this week’s news article regarding her paying a claim in violation of the California Tort Claims Act, it seems the focus at City Hall has shifted dramatically over to spotlight the continued poor judgment displayed by Council Member Mike Judge with his Facebook misadventures re soft porn likes and now his sharing of “snuff flicks.”

I am not really sure where all this City Hall Lack of Good Judgment thing is coming from, either.

Since the Simi Valley Police Officer’s Association (the local police officer union, not to be confused with the Simi Valley Police Department, a municipal police department), staged a successful coup in taking over City Hall three years ago in 2010, with the election of their endorsed candidate Mayor Bob Huber and the accidental election of “supported candidate” Council Member Mike Judge over their endorsed candidate Keith Mashburn, the word from inside City Hall is things have never been worse, have never been so unorganized, and morale has never been lower.

To back up a touch, the term “accidental election” regarding Mike Judge is a local colloquialism referencing the fact that in the 2010 municipal election, the Police Officer’s Association, the local police union, not to be confused with the Simi Valley Police Department, a municipal police department, endorsed council candidate Keith Mashburn, a retired fire department battalion chief. The Police Officer’s Association, the local police union, not to be confused with the Simi Valley Police Department, a municipal police department, flooded the town with signs for Mr. Mashburn, and on each sign, to show that Mr. Mashburn was endorsed by the police officer union, a police officer badge was prominently displayed. Come election booth time though, it is believed many associated the police officer badge on every other sign posted around town with the guy who had police officer next to his name on the ballot, Mike Judge.

And to explain the issues coming from inside City Hall, the first hand word that I have received is no decisions are being made, nothing can get done, everyone is so worried about protecting their backside that the documentation on each and every task has gone up multiple folds not to ensure the work is correct, but to protect one from the inevitable sharp shooting that comes from actually making a decision on something. Clerical staff get yelled at and belittled by a certain elected official. Department heads have given up on trying to deal with a certain high level attorney as it is possible that the person just cannot remember what she said from one day to the next, hence her constant denial of prior conversations and decisions. To the receivers, the shocked impression is that she is outright lying to their face, when an equally plausible explanation is that she suffers mental issues normally associated with advanced years.

In 2012, the police union again supported and helped elect Council Member Keith Mashburn. Mr. Mashburn appears to be getting comfortable with his new elected role and with six months now on the job, his honeymoon period with the press is about over. It remains to be seen what his positions are going to be in the future, but he also does not share the blame for the currently ongoing City Hall woes.

So back to the inbox. With the Mike Judge decapitation murder snuff flick issues going on this past week, my inbox has been snuffed, er, stuffed, with all kinds of things from the “whatever . . .” to “its his right to look at whatever he wants!” to “it’s a private Facebook page, get over it!” to “disgusting,” “where does this woman hating misogynist get off???” and “violence against women is not a training film!”

Frankly, I wish the issue would just go away. But instead of an apology from the wayward council member, we get weird postings from him along the lines of “no one is going to tell him what to do.” Kind of like how my then juvenile boys handled issues in seventh grade. And until he fesses up that he really, really blew it, things will continue to compound. Or as one observer relayed to me at the Street Fair (nice job by the way Chamber!), this snowball has taken a life of its own and its headed down hill fast.

So lets get started.

Dear Mitch

Did you see Mike Judge’s Friday’s Thought for the day? It looks like a cat with a torn up pizza in it’s mouth with the caption, “I regret nothing. NOTHING.” So he posts a picture of a cat that has obviously done something wrong and shows no remorse about it as something to think about? And that’s the message he felt like sending out? Is Mike really trying to say he has zero remorse and is fully aware that he did something wrong? I sure hope that is not what he intended. But if he was trying to say “I did nothing wrong” and totally missed that the picture he used sends a different message, what does that say about his ability to comprehend?

Judge Cat

Dear Reader (too many today to come up with cute names for you, so you all get to be “Dear Readers),

Yeah, I did see that post! What is up with that? The one comment that was sent to me was “This guy is an arrogant idiot!” The same person sent me a screen shot of Judge commenting Friday night, “I’m getting to the point where I wish dueling was still in vogue.” Now, what do you think Mike meant by that? Another reader sent me the same screen shot with the caption, “Mike Judge Wants to Shoot You.”

So here’s the question for today: Do you think that a) Mike Judge was just being cute with his statement that he wishes dueling were back in style; b) do you think Mike Judge was implying he wants to shoot someone? c) do you think Mike Judge was conveying the message that he would like to shoot me?

Here’s the screen shot . . .
Mike Judge Duel

***

Dear Mitch,

Mike Judge says he’s a Police officer who happens to be a City Councilman. Great. Do we really want someone who views representing our city and its citizens as something he just kind of does on the side?

Dear Reader,

Interesting take. I too noticed the play on words. Perhaps there is confusion over which hat to wear at any one time . . .

Or perhaps . . ., well, perhaps that observation can stay in the pocket for now . . . 😉

***

Dear Mitch

Have I got it right that at first the explanation for posting the decapitation video on Mike Judge’s Facebook page was to ID the killer and then when it was pointed out this was obviously a Mexican Drug Cartel video, the explanation went to it was a training tool? So when we find out something like there are rules against using these kinds of video as a training tool, will the explanation switch to something else?

Dear Reader,

Wow, it is so amazing how you caught that! If you were to listen to the supporters of this conduct, these simple observations tend to get lost, overlooked or (pointing finger in opposite direction), Hey! Quick! Look Over There!!!

My kids used to play the same games too . . . “Well, MAYBEE it happened that way!” Sure kid, and just MAYBEE you’re gonna git chur butt whipped! (Ahem, figuratively . . ., such tender dear boys . . .)

***

Dear Mitch

What is going on with City Hall? Between signing void contracts, posting videos of people’s heads being cut off and paying $20,000 on expired claims, it makes you wonder if there is anyone who works there that has half a brain? And as long as they are passing out free money, when can I get mine?

Dear Reader,

Heck, I’d like some free money too. Maybe some health and dental benefits, pension contributions . . ., all that. Then MAYBEE I could sit at my desk all day long, twirl around in my chair, suck up to my elected friends, take long naps behind closed doors, rush off with my clip board in hand looking very busy, “Not now! See me when I get back! Better yet, send me a memo!!”

But then again, I also like actually getting things done . . .

***

Dear Mitch

Remember when Doug Crosse was ready to sue over Steve Sokja’s cell phone reimbursement that was something like $7,000 over 14 years? Where is he now that the City has forked over $20,000 on a claim it didn’t have to pay?

Dear Reader,

Yeah, what is that all about?

Doug Crosse! Come back! Your City Needs You! Bring Your Broom!

***

Dear Mitch

What happened to all your posts on Vote Simi Valley? You and Chandler still cool post the Mike Judge issue?

Dear Reader,

Yes, I think so, but the Mike Judge issue hasn’t gone away yet, so that remains to be seen. Until we see how all this shakes out, lets just say we are working things out, and the prior columns have all been safely tucked away.

***

Dear Mitch?

I saw that you have been kicked off the Facebook page, Simi Valley Letters to The Editor again. And then the natives enjoyed a good old fashion “parade the head on a stick” post hatchet job party at your expense.

You are probably not missing out on too much, other than the denial of your First Amendment Rights for pointing out the Councilman “wears no clothes.” Funny how the defenders of a certain local politician demand First Amendment rights for their boy to watch and share human decapitation videos, but insist on censure and denial of those same First Amendment rights for anyone pointing out that this public figure has publicly embarrassed himself and Simi Valley.

You do know that Letters to The Editor was started as a Republican political operation, and it has now been taken over as a propaganda site for the radical right fringe group called the California Republican Assembly or CRA for short? And the voices there all tend to agree with each other as they boot anyone who does not follow the right wing fringe Republican agenda.

Wherever YOUR political sympathies lay, I doubt they fall in with the “right wing fringe” group.

OK, “Dear Reader,” that voice was barely disguised. But I’ll play along and say, “I couldn’t have said it better myself!”

***

Dear Mitch,

Bill walked from Santa Monica to Westwood. It took 45 minutes to walk from Santa Monica to Brentwood. Then it took 25 minutes to walk from Brentwood to Westwood. He just arrived in Westwood. the current time is 2:30 P.M. At what time did he leave Santa Monica?

Do you start at the beginning of the problem, add 45 minutes and 25 minutes and then subtract that from the current time? Do you start at the current time and then go backwards 25 minutes and then another 45 minutes? Do you use a technique of random selection using reasoned deduction or do you methodically go in order to arrive at your solution?

Let me know which method you use.

***

Dear Reader,

Here I have to confess that I learned how to solve these kind of equations in my head at an early age. When I see a story math problem, I keep a running total in my head while I read the problem, waiting for the “call of the question.” If this were a formal test with a series of similar questions, I would be disciplined to glance first at the call of the question, here “At what time did he leave Santa Monica?” Then when I read the question, I see that we start in Santa Monica. Great. Add 45. Plus 25, running total up to 70. We arrive somewhere at 2:30, less 70 minutes = 1:20 in my head at the same time we arrive at the end of the paragraph with the final sentence, “At what time did he leave Santa Monica.” That for me happens simultaneously for me as I read the question.”

I learned how to do the same thing when I read a government claim coming into the City. You just knew which ones had denial written all over them from first glance, which ones blew their statute of limitations giving us an easy win before it even started, and which ones to pucker about. Its not really rocket surgery, its just doing the same thing over and over again and learning from your prior mistakes.

But if you keep doing the same mistake over and over again, well then, in the words of Ron White, “You can’t fix stupid.”

To recap, I do not always start at the beginning of a problem when I notice a trend. Sometimes you have to start with the patterned result, and then work you way backwards and then back forward again to arrive back at that same result. And then ask yourself, “Is there a pattern here that I need to be concerned about?”

So Simi Valley, what do you think?

Is there a pattern going on here we need to be concerned about?

***

Tell Mom you love her today, and if for some reason you cannot do that in person, thing loving thoughts of Mom and find your own way of telling her anyway.

Mitch

PS: I dare you all to share this link with our friends at Letters to The Editor! Such a shame they would miss out on our discussions . . . 😉